Reporting

Clinical Trial Reporting & Sponsor Study Assessment

ClariTria turns fragmented operational information into an independent sponsor-level view of study performance, emerging risk and areas requiring attention. Below: what we review, what you actually receive, a side-by-side example, and a sample illustrative dashboard.

Discuss Your Study

What ClariTria Reviews

We look beyond the headline status.

Enrollment

Are actual recruitment trends consistent with expectations?

Site Performance

Which sites are performing, drifting or showing warning signals?

CRO Reporting

Does the information being reported provide a complete picture of study performance?

Timelines

Are emerging operational issues likely to affect milestones?

Data & Quality Signals

Are available signals pointing toward potential operational or quality concerns?

Actions & Follow-Through

Are important issues being addressed and followed through?

That flow — Enrollment → Sites → CRO → Timelines → Data → Actions — is enough to produce a single, comparable number for every engagement: the ClariTria Study Health Assessment™.

We don't replace operational reporting. We make it more useful to the sponsor.

ClariTria turns fragmented operational information into an independent sponsor-level view of study performance, emerging risk and areas requiring attention.

72/100

ClariTria Study Health Score

Recruitment 81

Site Performance 64

CRO Follow-Through 58

Timeline Risk 76

Data Signals 83

Illustrative example — not based on a specific client study. Category weighting is calibrated to each engagement's protocol and risk profile.

What You Receive

What you actually receive.

Independent Study Assessment

A structured view of current study performance and emerging risk.

Operational Risk Summary

The issues that deserve attention now.

Trend Analysis

Where performance is improving, deteriorating or diverging from expectations.

Sponsor-Level Reporting

Clear findings without unnecessary operational noise.

Recommendations

Questions, areas for investigation and potential actions for sponsor consideration.

Ongoing Oversight

For recurring engagements, periodic independent assessments showing what has changed and what deserves attention.

What Independent Assessment Looks Like

CRO report vs. ClariTria review.

CRO Reports

“Enrollment remains within acceptable trajectory.”

ClariTria Review Identifies

Recruitment concentrated in a small number of sites
Several sites showing little or no meaningful recruitment
Changes in screening-to-enrollment performance
Delayed recruitment actions
Increasing dependence on a small number of high-performing sites

Sponsor View

What is happening, why it may matter, what deserves investigation, what questions should be asked, and what actions may warrant consideration.

Illustrative example — not based on a specific client study.

Illustrative Dashboard — Advanced Sponsor Oversight

What a study under watch looks like.

A sample of the kind of picture ClariTria's independent assessment surfaces for a sponsor — reflecting the level of detail included under Advanced Sponsor Oversight.

Study Health

3 open items are trending toward escalation if unaddressed — see flagged sites.

Site-level risk analysis: 3 of 18 sites flagged high-risk
Recruitment-risk analysis: Top 2 sites carry 61% of enrollment
CRO action-plan follow-through: 2 of 5 open items overdue
Escalated to sponsor this cycle: 1 item
Assessment cadence: Bi-weekly, Advanced tier

Flagged for Sponsor Attention

Site 07Enrollment

Zero enrollment for 3 weeks; IRB renewal still pending.
Site 12CRO Action Plan

Corrective action from last cycle still open, 14 days past due.
Site 03Escalation

Monitoring visit report overdue by 9 days — escalated to sponsor.